Defence & Aerospace · use case
Requirement Traceability
Write the requirements once, run them against the proposal set, and get one finding per requirement with the candidate passage attached or the gap stated.
The case
- The problem
- Tracing each requirement to the passage that answers it across multi-volume proposals is manual and error-prone.
- What DataStruct does
- Write the requirements once, run them against the proposal set, and get one finding per requirement with the candidate passage attached or the gap stated.
- What the reviewer gets
- A source-linked traceability matrix a reviewer signs off.
Documents and questions
What goes in, and what you can ask
Typical documents
- Bid Documents
- Technical Specs
- Compliance Matrices
- Supplier Audits
- Test Reports
- Certificates
Example questions
- “Where does this bid address each mandatory technical requirement?”
- “Which certificates does this supplier provide, and where?”
- “What testing standards are referenced?”
- “Compare supplier compliance across audit reports”
The boundary
A person makes the call
DataStruct locates and prepares the evidence, links it to its source and states what it could not confirm. A named reviewer confirms, rejects or marks each finding for follow-up, and that decision is attributed and logged.
More in defence
- Bid Compliance VerificationCompliance matrix population with evidence references against each requirement, for reviewer sign-off.
- Supplier Compliance ManagementRun supplier audit reports against your requirements, with each finding linked to source.
- Technical Specification AnalysisExtract performance requirements, standards references, and acceptance criteria.
Try requirement traceability on your own documents
Book a demo and bring a sample of the documents this review runs on.